Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
90 Imaging
60 Features
57 Overall
58
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Previous Model is Samsung NX100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX210
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung NX200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was manufactured 8 years before the NX200 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung NX200
| E-300 | NX200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-300
| NX200 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | January 2005 | Newer by 86 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 134k | Sharper screen (+480k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX200
| E-300 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the NX200.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and NX200 is 67 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and NX200.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will provide greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX200 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Available lenses | 45 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 134k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $800 | $818 |