Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
60
Features
57
Overall
58

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Launched February 2012
  • Previous Model is Samsung NX100
  • Refreshed by Samsung NX210
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung NX200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was manufactured 8 years before the NX200 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung NX200

 E-300 NX200 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-300

 NX200 E-300 
LaunchedFebruary 2012January 2005Newer by 86 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution614k134kSharper screen (+480k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX200

 E-300 NX200 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the NX200.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and NX200 is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and NX200.

To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will provide greater detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Samsung NX200
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low MP (8MP)
76
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
72
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (223 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Samsung NX200 Sports photography advice
36
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
55
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Samsung NX200 Travel photography info
44
has built in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (8MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
68
lighter than others in class (223g)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX200 as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse mode
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX200 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
34
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (223 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
no microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX200
 Olympus E-300Samsung NX200
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung NX200
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2005-01-10 2012-02-28
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 15
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Available lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 134k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 223 grams (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $800 $818