Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300M front Samsung NX300M front"
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX300M, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-300 was revealed 9 years earlier than the NX300M which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the NX300M in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX300M. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung NX300M
E-300 | NX300M |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-300
NX300M | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 97 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+634k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX300M
E-300 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung NX300M in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 vs the NX300M.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90775/9077592b3a7a005a1b218e7a61d3bea2c13d900b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and NX300M is 67 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ac60/0ac608b3abc1049037f45020d996f3c61ac33f8d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and NX300M.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300M will resolve greater detail because of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af4b/7af4bb09c94826f5b476caacd95b9231c3d27caa" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db457/db4578745490687b4f3c3c375bb00965fc54f247" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Samsung NX300M |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2013-01-03 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 45 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 331g (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $800 | $699 |