Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SL202 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was introduced 5 years before the SL202 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-300 grades against the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung SL202
E-300 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus E-300
SL202 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | January 2005 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung SL202
E-300 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the SL202.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SL202 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and SL202.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung SL202 will provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | PL50 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $140 |