Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Other Name is PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SL202 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was introduced 5 years before the SL202 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-300 grades against the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung SL202

 E-300 SL202 
Manual focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus E-300

 SL202 E-300 
LaunchedFebruary 2009January 2005Fresher by 49 months
Display size2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kCrisper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung SL202

 E-300 SL202 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the SL202.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and SL202 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and SL202.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung SL202 will provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography features
48
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
25
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Samsung SL202 Street photography information
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
27
fairly wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
9
lack of video recording
27
fairly wide (28mm)
includes face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung SL202
 Olympus E-300Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung SL202
Also called as EVOLT E-300 PL50
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-02-17
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 168g (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $800 $140