Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung ST6500 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
29
Overall
34

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Samsung ST6500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview

The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung ST6500, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ST6500 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ST6500 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was revealed 7 years before the ST6500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-300 grades against the ST6500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung ST6500

 E-300 ST6500 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Olympus E-300

 ST6500 E-300 
RevealedJanuary 2011January 2005Newer by 73 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kCrisper display (+326k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST6500

 E-300 ST6500 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung ST6500 has measurements of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung ST6500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-300 vs the ST6500.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ST6500 is 67 and 99 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ST6500.

Clearly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Samsung ST6500 will resolve more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Samsung ST6500
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (8MP)
29
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Samsung ST6500 Street photography factors
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
50
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Samsung ST6500
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
29
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Samsung ST6500
45
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
low resolution (8MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
73
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Samsung ST6500
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
43
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Samsung ST6500 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
32
reasonably wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is touchscreen
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung ST6500
 Olympus E-300Samsung ST6500
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung ST6500
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Revealed 2005-01-10 2011-01-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) -
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) -
Card slots One One
Launch cost $800 -