Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung TL100, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TL100 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TL100 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was announced 5 years prior to the TL100 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung TL100 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-300 grades versus the TL100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL100. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung TL100
| E-300 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Olympus E-300
| TL100 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 | January 2005 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL100
| E-300 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 versus Samsung TL100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the TL100.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and TL100 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The pic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and TL100.
All in all, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung TL100 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung TL100 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | ST50 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 219 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $800 | $22 |