Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched July 2019
- Refreshed by Sigma fp L
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-300 versus Sigma fp, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and fp (25MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and fp (Full frame) use different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was manufactured 15 years before the fp and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-300 grades versus the fp when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Sigma fp. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sigma fp
| E-300 | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus E-300
| fp | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2019 | January 2005 | More recent by 176 months | |
| Display sizing | 3.2" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.4") | |
| Display resolution | 2100k | 134k | Crisper display (+1966k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sigma fp
| E-300 | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 comes with outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Sigma fp in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 versus the fp.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and fp is 67 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and fp.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma fp will provide extra detail due to its extra 17 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-300 vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sigma fp |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 25MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
| Available lenses | 45 | 30 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 2,100k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 422g (0.93 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $800 | $2,050 |