Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha A9 front
Portability
65
Imaging
74
Features
93
Overall
81

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Renewed by Olympus E-330
Sony A9
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
  • Released April 2017
  • Newer Model is Sony A9 II
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A9, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A9 (24MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A9 (Full frame) come with different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was released 13 years prior to the A9 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the A9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A9

 E-300 A9 

Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Olympus E-300

 A9 E-300 
ReleasedApril 2017January 2005More recent by 149 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1440k134kCrisper display (+1306k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A9

 E-300 A9 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony A9 has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 and Sony A9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 vs the A9.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and A9 is 67 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and A9.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony A9 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 16MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony A9
48
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
84
has manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Sony A9 Street photography details
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
79
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
provides focus via touch
weather sealing
above average high ISO (51,200)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Sony A9 Sports photography info
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
87
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (20.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (24MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
comes with phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Sony A9 Travel photography factors
45
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
74
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
weather sealing
connects via bluetooth
provides focus via touch
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A9 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
86
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (24MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
above average high ISO (51,200)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
better than average battery power (650 shots)
two card slots
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony A9 Vlogging features
9
no video
37
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have mic socket
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A9
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha A9
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha A9
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2005-01-10 2017-04-19
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.6 x 23.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 847.3mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 400 51200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 204800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 693
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134k dots 1,440k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 3,686k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 20.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 673g (1.48 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 92
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.9
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 3517
Other
Battery life - 650 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible)
Card slots 1 Dual
Cost at launch $800 $4,498