Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released January 2008
  • Updated by Sony A330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was released 4 years before the A300 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-300 grades vs the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A300

 E-300 A300 

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-300

 A300 E-300 
ReleasedJanuary 2008January 2005Newer by 37 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300

 E-300 A300 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 and the A300.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A300 is 67 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and A300.

All in all, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony A300 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Sony A300 Portrait photography information
48
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
resolution not great (8MP)
59
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Sony A300 Street photography advice
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
74
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Sony A300 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Sony A300
45
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony A300
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
57
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
9
no video shooting
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A300
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Other name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2005-01-10 2008-01-30
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 632 gr (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $800 $0