Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfb5/1cfb573f9a199713750718c4e753341b4a66f33c" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front"
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Updated by Sony A330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the A300 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-300 was released 4 years before the A300 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-300 grades vs the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A300
E-300 | A300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-300
A300 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2008 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 37 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300
E-300 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Sony A300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 and the A300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f651b/f651b68b6a856ac4b91bb6badd3fb9e84b167611" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A300 is 67 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dbdf/4dbdf966ebf2283439cb4a7e886e87de499159cd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and A300.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Sony A300 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c648/9c648d0260b5625dd0593645bcf546aaf8501807" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17248/17248e6a18592529ab50c5bc50d68fb055edab73" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Other name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 632 gr (1.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $0 |