Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front
Portability
67
Imaging
50
Features
50
Overall
50

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony A330
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Succeeded the Sony A300
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Overview

The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus E-300 and Sony A330, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the A330 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A330 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was introduced 5 years prior to the A330 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-300 matches up against the A330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A330

 E-300 A330 

Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus E-300

 A330 E-300 
LaunchedMay 2009January 2005Newer by 52 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A330

 E-300 A330 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 has physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A330 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 and Sony A330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the A330.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A330 is 67 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and A330.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A330 will provide extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography advice
Sony A330 Portrait photography advice
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
62
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detect focus
exports RAW files
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony A330
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
75
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Sony A330 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery power (230 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Sony A330 Travel photography features
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (8MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
44
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (230 shots)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A330 as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
54
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
bad battery power (230 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Sony A330 Vlogging advice
9
no video
9
lack of video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A330
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Alternative name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2005-01-10 2009-05-18
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 529g (1.17 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 535
Other
Battery life - 230 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $800 $545