Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced June 2008
  • Successor is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Overview

Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A350, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A350 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A350 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was released 4 years prior to the A350 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-300 grades versus the A350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A350

 E-300 A350 

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus E-300

 A350 E-300 
AnnouncedJune 2008January 2005More recent by 41 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A350

 E-300 A350 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the A350.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and A350 is 67 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and A350.

Plainly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A350 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Sony A350 Portrait photography info
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
MP count low (8 megapixels)
71
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Sony A350 as a Street photography camera
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
66
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
more heavy than average in class (674 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Sony A350 Sports photography highlights
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Sony A350 Travel photography information
45
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
51
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (674g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Sony A350 Landscape photography features
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
64
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Sony A350 Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
9
no video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A350
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Also called EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2005-01-10 2008-06-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $800 $600