Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
54
Overall
54

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Sony A390
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Old Model is Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was brought out 6 years before the A390 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-300 scores versus the A390 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A390

 E-300 A390 

Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-300

 A390 E-300 
IntroducedJuly 2010January 2005More modern by 67 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k134kSharper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390

 E-300 A390 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the A390.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and A390 is 67 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and A390.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A390 Portrait photography highlights
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
72
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Sony A390 Street photography advice
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
76
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Sony A390 Sports photography advice
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Sony A390
45
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
53
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Sony A390 Landscape photography features
43
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse mode
61
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7")
terrible battery power (230 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Sony A390
9
lack of video recording
9
can't shoot video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A390
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2005-01-10 2010-07-28
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 549 grams (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 607
Other
Battery life - 230 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $800 $500