Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was brought out 6 years before the A390 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-300 scores versus the A390 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A390
E-300 | A390 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-300
A390 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 67 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390
E-300 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony A390 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the A390.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and A390 is 67 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and A390.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony A390 will render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $800 | $500 |