Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-300 was revealed 9 years before the NEX-3N and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the NEX-3N with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony NEX-3N
E-300 | NEX-3N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-300
NEX-3N | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 98 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3N
E-300 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/544e2/544e29bd01ac26e9ada7ccf8331fb205eeb358bd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and NEX-3N is 67 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fd2c/6fd2c898f4d503fc17b349b53072c85a2d473132" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and NEX-3N.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will give you greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b278/7b278dc7fbd0ec4ff392c9402b4b1111e3339b7a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a0f7/6a0f74d206eee045da420b1d805924ddfa906158" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 16000 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 45 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $800 | $399 |