Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
  • Successor is Sony a5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was revealed 9 years before the NEX-3N and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-300 scores versus the NEX-3N with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony NEX-3N

 E-300 NEX-3N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-300

 NEX-3N E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2013January 2005More recent by 98 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kClearer display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3N

 E-300 NEX-3N 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the NEX-3N.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and NEX-3N is 67 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and NEX-3N.

To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will give you greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
66
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony NEX-3N
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
77
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Sony NEX-3N Sports photography info
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
53
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great battery life (480 shots)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Travel photography camera
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (8MP)
does not feature selfie friendly display
71
great battery life (480 per charge)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography details
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse recording
70
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (480 per charge)
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
28
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-3N
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Alternate name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2005-01-10 2013-02-25
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 400 16000
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 269g (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 photographs
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $800 $399