Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
57
Features
57
Overall
57

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Introduced August 2011
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
  • Renewed by Sony NEX-F3
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Sony NEX-C3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was launched 7 years before the NEX-C3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-300 scores versus the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony NEX-C3

 E-300 NEX-C3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-300

 NEX-C3 E-300 
IntroducedAugust 2011January 2005More recent by 80 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k134kClearer screen (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-C3

 E-300 NEX-C3 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 vs the NEX-C3.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and NEX-C3 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through specs. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and NEX-C3.

All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony NEX-C3 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
74
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony NEX-C3
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
80
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (225 grams)
lack of image stabilization
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
53
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (400 shots)
continuous shooting slow (6.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Sony NEX-C3 Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
good battery power (400 CIPA)
lighter than competition (225g)
good megapixels (16MP)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-C3
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
70
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3")
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
good battery power (400 CIPA)
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony NEX-C3 Vlogging features
9
no video recording
27
lighter than competition (225 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-C3
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2005-01-10 2011-08-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 225 grams (0.50 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.2
DXO Low light score not tested 1083
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $800 $343