Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Released August 2012
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 versus Sony NEX-F3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was launched 8 years prior to the NEX-F3 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-300 matches up vs the NEX-F3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony NEX-F3

 E-300 NEX-F3 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-300

 NEX-F3 E-300 
ReleasedAugust 2012January 2005Newer by 92 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k134kCrisper screen (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-F3

 E-300 NEX-F3 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 compared to the NEX-F3.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and NEX-F3 is 67 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and NEX-F3.

Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography information
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (8MP)
74
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
76
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Sony NEX-F3
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
53
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
better than average battery (470 shots)
max frames per second very slow (6.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography features
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse recording
70
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
27
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
does not have microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-01-10 2012-08-16
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 400 16000
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 314g (0.69 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $800 $470