Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony QX1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was brought out 10 years before the QX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-300 matches up against the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony QX1

 E-300 QX1 
Screen dimensions1.8""Bigger screen (+1.8")
Screen resolution134k0kCrisper screen (+134k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-300

 QX1 E-300 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014January 2005More modern by 117 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony QX1

 E-300 QX1 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 comes with exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Sony QX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-300 and the QX1.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and QX1 is 67 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and QX1.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony QX1 will give more detail having its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
66
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography information
Sony QX1 Street photography information
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Sony QX1
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
56
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery pack (440 shots)
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography highlights
Sony QX1 Travel photography highlights
45
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
low resolution (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
71
good battery pack (440 shots)
comes with touch to focus
good resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Sony QX1 Landscape photography highlights
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
64
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (440 shots)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony QX1 Vlogging features
9
can't record video
32
touchscreen enabled
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony QX1
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha QX1
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2005-01-10 2014-09-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 400 16000
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inches -
Display resolution 134k dots 0k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots One One
Price at release $800 $500