Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Old Model is Sony A6000
  • New Model is Sony A6500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A6300, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was introduced 12 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-300 scores versus the A6300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A6300

 E-300 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-300

 A6300 E-300 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016January 2005More modern by 134 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution922k134kClearer display (+788k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A6300

 E-300 A6300 
Manual focus More precise focus
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A6300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 and the A6300.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A6300 is 67 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and A6300.

Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A6300 will offer more detail using its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony A6300
48
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (8 megapixels)
80
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography highlights
Sony A6300 Street photography highlights
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
79
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Sony A6300 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
75
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
has phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Sony A6300 Travel photography factors
45
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low MP (8MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
76
weather proofing
megapixel count good (24MP)
built-in flash
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Sony A6300 Landscape photography details
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A6300 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
35
provides face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has mic jack
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A6300
 Olympus E-300Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Alpha a6300
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2005-01-10 2016-02-03
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 51200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 425
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Highest video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 404g (0.89 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $800 $889