Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was announced 11 months before the Galaxy Camera 4G and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR Digital IV grades against the Galaxy Camera 4G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR Digital IV | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 0k | Clearer screen (+1230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Galaxy Camera 4G | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | September 2011 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Screen sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
GR Digital IV | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV against the Galaxy Camera 4G.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and Galaxy Camera 4G is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-09-15 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $599 | $550 |