Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A380
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A350, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A350 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A350 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was released 8 years after the A350 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A350
E-M1 II | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | June 2008 | More modern by 101 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A350 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A350
E-M1 II | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II and the A350.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A350 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A350.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2008-06-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 674 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $600 |