Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Released June 2008
  • Refreshed by Sony A380
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Overview

Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A350, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A350 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A350 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was released 8 years after the A350 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A350

 E-M1 II A350 
ReleasedSeptember 2016June 2008More modern by 101 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A350 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A350

 E-M1 II A350 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II and the A350.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A350 is 68 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A350.

Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Sony A350 Portrait photography info
76
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
71
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Sony A350 Street photography information
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
66
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
more heavy than competitors in class (674 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony A350 Sports photography advice
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (350 shots)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Sony A350 Travel photography features
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment sealing
offers touch to focus
good resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery power (350 shots)
51
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (674 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
Sony A350 Landscape photography features
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
terrible battery power (350 shots)
64
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Sony A350 Vlogging features
79
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic socket
lighter than competition in class (574g)
9
no video shooting
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A350
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2016-09-19 2008-06-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 None
Video data format MOV, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 65
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 11.5
DXO Low light rating 1312 595
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Dual 1
Launch cost $1,700 $600