Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
87 Imaging
32 Features
29 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Introduced May 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the H20 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was announced 5 years before the H20 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-300 scores versus the H20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony H20
| E-300 | H20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-300
| H20 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2009 | January 2005 | More recent by 52 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20
| E-300 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 and the H20.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and H20 is 67 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and H20.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony H20 will give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $800 | $249 |