Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Introduced May 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the H20 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe E-300 was announced 5 years before the H20 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-300 scores versus the H20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony H20
| E-300 | H20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-300
| H20 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2009 | January 2005 | More recent by 52 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20
| E-300 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Sony H20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-300 and the H20.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and H20 is 67 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and H20.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony H20 will give you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-300 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $800 | $249 |