Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 front
Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Sony H55
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-300 and Sony H55, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and H55 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was announced 6 years prior to the H55 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-300 scores against the H55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony H55

 E-300 H55 
Manual focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-300

 H55 E-300 
LaunchedJune 2010January 2005More recent by 66 months
Screen sizing3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony H55

 E-300 H55 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 provides outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony H55 has specifications of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 and Sony H55 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-300 against the H55.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and H55 is 67 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and H55.

All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony H55 will show extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Sony H55 Portrait photography info
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8 megapixels)
28
good MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony H55
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Sony H55 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Sony H55
45
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
MP count low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
67
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
no Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H55 as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
42
decently wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging information
Sony H55 Vlogging information
9
no video shooting
28
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony H55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony H55
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55
Also called as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2005-01-10 2010-06-16
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 200 grams (0.44 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $800 $235