Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- Replacement is Sony RX10 III
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10 II, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was released 11 years prior to the RX10 II which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 grades vs the RX10 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony RX10 II
E-300 | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-300
RX10 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | January 2005 | More modern by 126 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 134k | Clearer display (+1095k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10 II
E-300 | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 comes with physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX10 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 against the RX10 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and RX10 II is 67 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and RX10 II.
All in all, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony RX10 II will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 134k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 813 gr (1.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $998 |