Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Launched June 2013
- Succeeded the Sony RX100
- New Model is Sony RX100 III
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX100 II, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RX100 II (1") feature different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was announced 9 years prior to the RX100 II which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-300 grades versus the RX100 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony RX100 II
E-300 | RX100 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Olympus E-300
RX100 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | January 2005 | More modern by 103 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 134k | Sharper screen (+1095k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX100 II
E-300 | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony RX100 II has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX100 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-300 and the RX100 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and RX100 II is 67 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and RX100 II.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony RX100 II will render extra detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2013-06-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 281 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $800 | $598 |