Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Released October 2015
  • Older Model is Sony RX1R
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-300 versus Sony RX1R II, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was brought out 11 years before the RX1R II and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades against the RX1R II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-300 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-300

 RX1R II E-300 
ReleasedOctober 2015January 2005Fresher by 130 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution1229k134kCrisper screen (+1095k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony RX1R II

 E-300 RX1R II 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 has outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Sony RX1R II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 compared to the RX1R II.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and RX1R II is 67 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and RX1R II.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-300 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony RX1R II will give you greater detail having its extra 34 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography factors
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low resolution sensor (8MP)
85
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
sensor resolution is fantastic (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Sony RX1R II Street photography details
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
73
has a tilting screen
sensor size is large (Full frame)
delivers RAW formats
great high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
Sony RX1R II Sports photography advice
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
63
sensor resolution is fantastic (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (35mm)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (220 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Sony RX1R II Travel photography information
45
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
sensor resolution is fantastic (42 megapixels)
great max aperture (f2.0)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (220 shots)
more heavy than average (507 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse mode
68
you can focus manually
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is fantastic (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
bad battery life (220 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Sony RX1R II
9
no video recording
34
great max aperture (f2.0)
includes face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external microphone support
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average (507 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2015-10-13
Physical type Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 102400
Min native ISO 100 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.0
Macro focusing range - 14cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 507g (1.12 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $800 $3,300