Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
93 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S2100, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and S2100 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and S2100 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was introduced 6 years before the S2100 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony S2100 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 grades against the S2100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony S2100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony S2100
| E-300 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2100 over the Olympus E-300
| S2100 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 60 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony S2100
| E-300 | S2100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony S2100 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony S2100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 and the S2100.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and S2100 is 67 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and S2100.
As you can see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony S2100 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-300 vs Sony S2100 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 134k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $800 | $0 |