Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the T900 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-300 matches up against the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony T900
E-300 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-300
T900 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2009 | January 2005 | More modern by 49 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.7") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 134k | Crisper screen (+788k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900
E-300 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and T900 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and T900.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $300 |