Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the T900 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-300 matches up against the T900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony T900

 E-300 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-300

 T900 E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2009January 2005More modern by 49 months
Screen dimensions3.5"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.7")
Screen resolution922k134kCrisper screen (+788k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900

 E-300 T900 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the T900.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and T900 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and T900.

As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony T900 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony T900
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
27
has manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Sony T900 Street photography details
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Sony T900 Sports photography highlights
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000s)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Sony T900 Travel photography info
45
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (8MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Sony T900
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse function
36
has manual focus
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Sony T900 Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
28
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony T900
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Alternative name EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2005-01-10 2009-02-17
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 1.8 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of display 134k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lb) 143 gr (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $300