Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W220 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was unveiled 5 years prior to the W220 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-300 matches up vs the W220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony W220

 E-300 W220 

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-300

 W220 E-300 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009January 2005Newer by 48 months
Screen dimensions2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony W220

 E-300 W220 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-300 and the W220.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and W220 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and W220.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W220 will give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Sony W220
48
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
27
manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Sony W220
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W220 as a Sports photography camera
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Sony W220 Travel photography factors
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Sony W220 Landscape photography info
43
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
32
manual focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
Sony W220 Vlogging features
9
lack of video recording
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony W220
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2009-01-08
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 147 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $800 $160