Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320

Portability
67
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Overview

The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the W320 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-300 grades vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony W320

 E-300 W320 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-300

 W320 E-300 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2005Newer by 60 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony W320

 E-300 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 versus the W320.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and W320 is 67 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and W320.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony W320 will offer extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Sony W320 Portrait photography info
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
28
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Sony W320 Street photography features
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
36
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Sony W320 Travel photography features
44
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
66
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography information
Sony W320 Landscape photography information
42
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
33
pretty wide (26mm)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Sony W320 Vlogging factors
9
lack of video recording
26
pretty wide (26mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony W320
 Olympus E-300Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2005-01-10 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range - 4cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8" 2.7"
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $800 $269