Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and W320 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the W320 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-300 grades vs the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony W320
| E-300 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-300
| W320 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | January 2005 | Newer by 60 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony W320
| E-300 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 versus the W320.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and W320 is 67 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and W320.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony W320 will offer extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-300 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $800 | $269 |