Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
70
Overall
62

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Superseded the Sony A33
  • Replacement is Sony A37
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-300 was brought out 7 years before the A35 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades against the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A35

 E-300 A35 

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-300

 A35 E-300 
LaunchedSeptember 2011January 2005More recent by 81 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kCrisper display (+787k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A35

 E-300 A35 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outside dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 compared to the A35.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and A35 is 67 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and A35.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A35 will offer you more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography information
Sony A35 Portrait photography information
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
74
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Sony A35 Street photography details
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
71
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (415g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Sony A35
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
61
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
terrible battery (440 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Sony A35
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution (8MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
59
lighter than competition (415 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
terrible battery (440 per charge)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A35 as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
69
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
terrible battery (440 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Sony A35 Vlogging advice
9
no video
36
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone socket
lighter than competition (415g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A35
 Olympus E-300Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-300 Sony SLT-A35
Alternative name EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2005-01-10 2011-09-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 12.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lbs) 415 gr (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 763
Other
Battery life - 440 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $800 $598