Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
64 Imaging
64 Features
85 Overall
72
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Announced November 2011
- Successor is Sony A68
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A65, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-300 was brought out 7 years prior to the A65 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores against the A65 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A65
E-300 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-300
A65 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2011 | January 2005 | Newer by 83 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 134k | Clearer display (+787k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A65
E-300 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") and a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the A65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A65 is 67 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and A65.
To sum up, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will provide extra detail having its extra 16 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 134k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 622 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $700 |