Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
64
Features
85
Overall
72

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Announced November 2011
  • Successor is Sony A68
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A65, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-300 was brought out 7 years prior to the A65 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-300 scores against the A65 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Sony A65

 E-300 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-300

 A65 E-300 
AnnouncedNovember 2011January 2005Newer by 83 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kClearer display (+787k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Sony A65

 E-300 A65 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") and a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-300 versus Sony A65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the A65.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and A65 is 67 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and A65.

To sum up, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will provide extra detail having its extra 16 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A65 Portrait photography highlights
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
low MP (8MP)
78
has manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Sony A65 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
77
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Sony A65 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
82
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A65 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
low MP (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
68
resolution is good (24MP)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Sony A65 Landscape photography info
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
does not have Timelapse recording
75
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Sony A65
9
no video
78
screen is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-300 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Sony A65
 Olympus E-300Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-300 Sony SLT-A65
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2005-01-10 2011-11-15
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 622 grams (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $800 $700