Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Zeiss ZX1 front
Portability
67
Imaging
78
Features
62
Overall
71

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Zeiss ZX1
(Full Review)
  • 37MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 51200
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 35mm (F2-22) lens
  • 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
  • Revealed September 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Zeiss ZX1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Zeiss. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and ZX1 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-300 was revealed 14 years earlier than the ZX1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 matches up against the ZX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Zeiss ZX1

 E-300 ZX1 

Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus E-300

 ZX1 E-300 
RevealedSeptember 2018January 2005Newer by 166 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size4.34"1.8"Larger display (+2.54")
Display resolution2765k134kCrisper display (+2631k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Zeiss ZX1

 E-300 ZX1 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has sizing of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 and Zeiss ZX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the ZX1.

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and ZX1 is 67 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and ZX1.

Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Zeiss ZX1 will give more detail because of its extra 29MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Zeiss ZX1
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
86
has manual focus
sensor resolution is high (37MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Zeiss ZX1
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
70
screen can move to multiple angles
large sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
features focus via touch
above average ISO range (51,200)
does not have image stabilization
heavier than average (800g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Zeiss ZX1 Sports photography details
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
64
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is high (37MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (35mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography info
Zeiss ZX1 Travel photography info
45
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
65
has bluetooth
features focus via touch
sensor resolution is high (37MP)
fast max aperture (f2)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average (800 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Zeiss ZX1 Landscape photography features
43
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse function
69
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f2)
very good size screen (4.34 inch)
sensor resolution is high (37 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
above average ISO range (51,200)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging information
Zeiss ZX1 Vlogging information
9
lack of video recording
31
fast max aperture (f2)
screen is touchscreen
supports face detection autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
lack of external mic socket
heavier than average (800g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Zeiss ZX1
 Olympus E-300Zeiss ZX1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Zeiss
Model type Olympus E-300 Zeiss ZX1
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2018-09-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 36 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 864.0mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 37MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 7488 x 4992
Max native ISO 400 51200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 255
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2-22
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 1.8 inch 4.34 inch
Screen resolution 134 thousand dots 2,765 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 6,221 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 800g (1.76 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) 512GB internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $800 -