Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL2, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-330 was brought out 5 years before the E-PL2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-330 matches up vs the E-PL2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Olympus PEN E-PL2. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-PL2
E-330 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus E-330
E-PL2 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | More modern by 59 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL2
E-330 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 provides physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-PL2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-330 versus the E-PL2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e56e/2e56e3c71fcb055b30790fe2d1eb73077ea0760f" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-PL2 is 65 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8eec/a8eec4fee00e972dad8346655dbf94f7a8d36ab2" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The picture below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and E-PL2.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus E-PL2 to show more detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2114/e21145aa324fbc380bcf9cbe0dcde5ff0bdf782e" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57577/57577707e10c9e194defb8187541bdd92b020d84" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 362 gr (0.80 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,100 | $0 |