Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Launched March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2011
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX78, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-330 was released 5 years prior to the FX78 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-330 matches up vs the FX78 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FX78

 E-330 FX78 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-330

 FX78 E-330 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011March 2006Fresher by 59 months
Screen dimension3.5"2.5"Bigger screen (+1")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX78

 E-330 FX78 
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-330 against the FX78.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and FX78 is 65 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and FX78.

Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic FX78 will render more detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FX78 Portrait photography advice
54
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
21
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography highlights
Panasonic FX78 Street photography highlights
60
tilting screen
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
does not have image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Panasonic FX78
40
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
28
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (200 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography information
Panasonic FX78 Travel photography information
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (200 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
36
reasonably wide (24mm)
very good size screen (3.5 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Panasonic FX78
9
can't record video
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-FX77
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2006-03-18 2011-01-25
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lbs) 142 gr (0.31 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 200 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $1,100 $210