Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-330 was unveiled 8 years before the ZS35 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 scores versus the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS35
| E-330 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-330
| ZS35 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 95 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 215k | Clearer display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS35
| E-330 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 features outer dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-330 compared to the ZS35.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and ZS35 is 65 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and ZS35.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will give you greater detail having an extra 9MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $1,100 | $300 |