Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
50 Imaging
76 Features
52 Overall
66
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Older Model is Olympus E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Revealed March 2010
- New Model is Pentax 645Z
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-330 and Pentax 645D, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Pro DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 645D (40MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 645D (Medium format) have different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-330 was manufactured 5 years prior to the 645D and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax 645D being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-330 matches up versus the 645D with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Pentax 645D. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Pentax 645D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Pentax 645D
| E-330 | 645D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645D over the Olympus E-330
| 645D | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2010 |  | March 2006 | More recent by 48 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+706k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Pentax 645D
| E-330 | 645D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Pentax 645D has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") and a weight of 1480 grams (3.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 and Pentax 645D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 and the 645D.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and 645D is 65 and 50 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and 645D.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Pentax 645D will produce greater detail due to its extra 33MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax 645D Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Pentax 645D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Pentax 645D |
| Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Pro DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2010-03-10 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Prime II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 40 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 7264 x 5440 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 6 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.85x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/125 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 1480 gr (3.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 82 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1262 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 800 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | Dual |
| Retail pricing | $1,100 | $4,000 |