Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the E-520 (10MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor size (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-400 was introduced 23 months before the E-520 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-400 matches up vs the E-520 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus E-520. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-520
| E-400 | E-520 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-400
| E-520 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2008 |  | September 2006 | More recent by 23 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-520
| E-400 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 provides outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has sizing of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-400 against the E-520.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and E-520 is 77 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and E-520.
All in all, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files but you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus E-520 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2008-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $400 |