Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M1 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-400 was manufactured 8 years before the E-M1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-400 grades against the E-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M1
E-400 | E-M1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus E-400
E-M1 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 86 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper display (+822k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M1
E-400 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-400 compared to the E-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83d40/83d40d2b7d834c47ee9183beae52d145991edd7b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and E-M1 is 77 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c18bd/c18bdc7ccdbf1c5be992935296de3352b5f1115f" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and E-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 to produce more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1bf2/e1bf2defdb0b9605c165dc315a6627f89069d03e" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a68/05a68c34be1c364554a0c9b23029218d0ec55c4c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 497g (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $599 | $799 |