Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (Four Thirds).

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-400 was launched 10 years before the E-M10 II and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-400 scores vs the E-M10 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 E-400 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-400

 E-M10 II E-400 
RevealedAugust 2015September 2006More recent by 108 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kClearer screen (+825k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10 II

 E-400 E-M10 II 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has sizing of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 versus the E-M10 II.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-M10 II is 77 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and E-M10 II.

As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus E-M10 II to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography advice
46
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
72
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
83
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography information
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography information
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
73
features focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
45
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not have Timelapse recording
79
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging details
Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging details
9
no video
35
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Olympus E-400Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2006-09-14 2015-08-25
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 215k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.62x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 390 gr (0.86 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 842
Other
Battery life - 320 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $599 $499