Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Refreshed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10 III, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 12 years prior to the E-M10 III which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-400 grades against the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-400 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-400
E-M10 III | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 133 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+825k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10 III
E-400 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 has got outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has proportions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 vs the E-M10 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/946b6/946b6c5bfb5d9ee575125fe9f58f38c6c55a7bdc" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-M10 III is 77 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f7ec/4f7ec2d1c1d0005cc807a8cdc55492fc4259720f" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and E-M10 III.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus E-M10 III to resolve extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a49/76a4966df2b00173831dc3d43e77d996124cbb8b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/869a9/869a9c2456a7b9df2da7d2d1c8ee414f63733cac" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $599 | $650 |