Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P1
  • Successor is Olympus E-P3
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the E-P2 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was released 4 years prior to the E-P2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-400 matches up versus the E-P2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-P2

 E-400 E-P2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-400

 E-P2 E-400 
LaunchedApril 2010September 2006Newer by 43 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P2

 E-400 E-P2 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-400 and the E-P2.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-P2 is 77 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and E-P2.

As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus E-P2 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
45
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
manual exposure not available
MP count low (10MP)
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Olympus E-P2 Street photography advice
60
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography information
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
38
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (300 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
49
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
43
missing Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (300 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
44
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inch)
no liveview
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery pack (300 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
9
can't record video
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P2
 Olympus E-400Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus PEN E-P2
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2006-09-14 2010-04-22
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 56
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 505
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $599 $799