Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P5, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are sold by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-P5 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-400 was introduced 8 years prior to the E-P5 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-400 grades vs the E-P5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-P5
| E-400 | E-P5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Olympus E-400
| E-P5 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2013 | September 2006 | Fresher by 85 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 215k | Clearer display (+822k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P5
| E-400 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-P5 has proportions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-P5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-400 against the E-P5.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-P5 is 77 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and E-P5.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-P5 to deliver greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2013-10-03 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/320 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 420g (0.93 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 895 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $599 | $389 |