Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
86 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL8
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-PL7, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-400 was manufactured 9 years prior to the E-PL7 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-400 matches up against the E-PL7 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Olympus PEN E-PL7. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-PL7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-PL7
| E-400 | E-PL7 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Olympus E-400
| E-PL7 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | September 2006 | Fresher by 96 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 215k | Crisper display (+822k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-PL7
| E-400 | E-PL7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL7 has proportions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-PL7 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-400 and the E-PL7.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and E-PL7 is 77 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and E-PL7.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-PL7 to offer more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2014-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 873 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $599 | $499 |