Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Newer Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-PL9, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-400 was launched 12 years earlier than the E-PL9 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-400 grades vs the E-PL9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-PL9
E-400 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-400
E-PL9 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 138 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+825k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-PL9
E-400 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-PL9 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-400 versus the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a0d/05a0d2595fd3e3b783845a8fd46a7a406e86e1f0" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-PL9 is 77 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0be9e/0be9e22e01b07da05559ee25cb0b3fd3bd334a0f" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and E-PL9.
All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-PL9 to show more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7145f/7145f906a80d58e2aa51dfad0bbc186565694d72" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e675/2e6751ebfa30a17f20aefc7d32c3ed64f02ded90" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $599 |