Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38


88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-50, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

The E-400 was revealed 7 years earlier than the SH-50 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-400 scores against the SH-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SH-50
E-400 | SH-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-400
SH-50 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 76 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-50
E-400 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 provides outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-50 has sizing of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-400 and the SH-50.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and SH-50 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and SH-50.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus SH-50 will give more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus SH-50 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $300 |