Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
![Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-E-400/Olympus-E-400-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-565UZ/Olympus-SP-565UZ-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The E-400 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-400 matches up against the SP-565UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-400 | SP-565UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-400
SP-565UZ | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 28 months |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-400 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 and the SP-565UZ.
![Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and SP-565UZ is 77 and 72 respectively.
![Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and SP-565UZ.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor measurements. The E-400 has got the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-400-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $400 |