Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Previous Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview

The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is relatively comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-400 was manufactured 4 years prior to the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-400 matches up vs the SP-600 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-400 SP-600 UZ 

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-400

 SP-600 UZ E-400 
AnnouncedFebruary 2010September 2006Newer by 41 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-400 SP-600 UZ 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 against the SP-600 UZ.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and SP-600 UZ is 77 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and SP-600 UZ.

Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will provide greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Olympus SP-600 UZ Portrait photography features
46
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
resolution not great (10MP)
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Olympus SP-600 UZ Street photography advice
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
36
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Olympus SP-600 UZ Sports photography advice
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
31
long zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
51
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
long zoom (420mm)
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-600 UZ Landscape photography features
45
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
29
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging advice
Olympus SP-600 UZ Vlogging advice
9
no video
20
rather wide (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
 Olympus E-400Olympus SP-600 UZ
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus SP-600 UZ
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2006-09-14 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 143
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-420mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.4
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1/2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 455 grams (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $599 $189