Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2006
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also Known as mju 5010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 5010, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was brought out 4 years prior to the 5010 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 matches up against the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 5010

 E-400 5010 
Manually focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-400

 5010 E-400 
RevealedJanuary 2010September 2006Fresher by 40 months
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 5010

 E-400 5010 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 5010 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the 5010.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and 5010 is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and 5010.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus 5010 will deliver greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus 5010 as a Portrait photography camera
46
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual mode not possible
low MP (10MP)
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography features
Olympus 5010 Street photography features
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Olympus 5010
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
39
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography features
Olympus 5010 Travel photography features
49
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
65
MP count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus 5010
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
missing Timelapse function
38
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Olympus 5010
9
lack of video recording
29
really wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus 5010
 Olympus E-400Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus Stylus 5010
Also Known as - mju 5010
Class Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2006-09-14 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 7cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 pounds) 126g (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $599 $150