Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9e45/e9e457397531c200c69a31ad07004097ef5a77b7" alt="Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front"
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Newer Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju 5010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 5010, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-400 was brought out 4 years prior to the 5010 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-400 matches up against the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Stylus 5010. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus 5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 5010
E-400 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-400
5010 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 40 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 5010
E-400 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus 5010 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the 5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64023/64023f98da0d156644efb55e0e54b92f2b809a92" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and 5010 is 77 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e95cd/e95cdc04432f34383adcf3d79505dba9db6aaf6e" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and 5010.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus 5010 will deliver greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a2b8/5a2b80a8d1fb068fc881d01d109d49cc113a613a" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b202d/b202de35deb0cba3600c0be54b1aacadf7fbccb8" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus 5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus 5010 |
Also Known as | - | mju 5010 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 126g (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $150 |