Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-400 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the SH-2 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SH-2
E-400 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-400
SH-2 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 103 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-2
E-400 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-400 compared to the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a72/a6a721fa1004ae01e9215073e235a51e056560f5" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and SH-2 is 77 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bebd6/bebd6e5dcd8999974fa3f690ad36bc2af387d378" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and SH-2.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-2 will give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c20f0/c20f05a21464dc6253283755165ddc83ec6fc16b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72093/72093f13dd12e467d1e17b568f160f22638e4a29" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $599 | $399 |