Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched March 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus SH-1
  • New Model is Olympus SH-3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the SH-2 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SH-2

 E-400 SH-2 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-400

 SH-2 E-400 
LaunchedMarch 2015September 2006Newer by 103 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kClearer screen (+245k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-2

 E-400 SH-2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-400 compared to the SH-2.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and SH-2 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and SH-2.

Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-2 will give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography features
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography features
46
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
44
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Street photography advice
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography details
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography details
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
51
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography advice
49
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
74
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
features touch to focus
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography factors
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
55
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
35
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (271g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-2
 Olympus E-400Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-09-14 2015-03-11
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 11.5 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 271 grams (0.60 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 380 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $599 $399