Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus SH-3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-400 was released 10 years before the SH-3 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-400 grades against the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SH-3
E-400 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-400
SH-3 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | September 2006 | More recent by 114 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SH-3
E-400 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 and the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4022b/4022b3586d811a575cdea1ce0a91d6357393001c" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and SH-3 is 77 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01e05/01e05b96f5f2f69014a53eb95690d994f9b37047" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The visual here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and SH-3.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus SH-3 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11e5/f11e523e63c5c5dcd270e438dd3962f42dc271c6" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3875d/3875d731cc38ea1090be06de02cf9324d615c311" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $579 |