Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was introduced 4 years before the Tough-3000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-400 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 E-400 Tough-3000 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-400

 Tough-3000 E-400 
ReleasedJanuary 2010September 2006Fresher by 40 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kSharper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus Tough-3000

 E-400 Tough-3000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-400 and the Tough-3000.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and Tough-3000 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and Tough-3000.

Plainly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will resolve more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
46
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
no manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography info
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography info
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography features
Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography features
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
36
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography advice
Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography advice
49
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
environment proof
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography highlights
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5")
no liveview
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
35
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-400
Vlogging with Olympus Tough-3000
9
can't record video
28
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Olympus E-400Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also called as - mju Tough 3000
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2010-01-07
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range - 2cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 pounds) 159 grams (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $599 $0