Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-400 was introduced 4 years before the Tough-3000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-400 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-400 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-400
Tough-3000 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | September 2006 | Fresher by 40 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-400 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-400 and the Tough-3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and Tough-3000 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and Tough-3000.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will resolve more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $0 |