Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-400 was launched 4 years before the 6020 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-400 scores vs the 6020 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 6020
| E-400 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-400
| 6020 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 41 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 6020
| E-400 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-400 against the 6020.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and 6020 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and 6020.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-400 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus 6020 will render more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2006-09-14 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $279 |
